|
Day 1
Oct 13, 2008 15:33:33 GMT -5
Post by MacGuffin on Oct 13, 2008 15:33:33 GMT -5
He wanted to use paraphrasing of village PMs to make a loose mason network, that's what I read from his statements anyways. Yeah, thought of that to, i mean he espacially talked about the PM's, i still didn't like it.
|
|
|
Day 1
Oct 13, 2008 15:43:21 GMT -5
Post by dacvin on Oct 13, 2008 15:43:21 GMT -5
Isn't warban always like that? I mean, he's probable trying to scare us off with false information.
Still, I say we need to kill him off ASAP. He's probably inoffensive now, but all the accumulated weirdness could bite us in the ass later on.
|
|
|
Day 1
Oct 13, 2008 15:51:42 GMT -5
Post by thetheroo on Oct 13, 2008 15:51:42 GMT -5
So, jail Warban as well? Maybe not kill him, but at least jail him.
|
|
bliss
Junior Member
Posts: 63
|
Day 1
Oct 13, 2008 15:57:18 GMT -5
Post by bliss on Oct 13, 2008 15:57:18 GMT -5
Since the village seems to be taking care of TehSpectre for us, I'm fine with Thetheroo's target ideas. Quoth is a dangerous player who doesn't usually get killed early so I'm very happy with killing her. The way I understood it, the Interrogate and Accident options can be used on people who are already in jail, so they'd be available tomorrow at the earliest. Not sure. If we can use them today, I'd like to interrogate DA and arrange an "accident" for Exarch ( please please please let it be a toilet accident!). I probably won't be online when the day ends, so someone else send them in later on. Maybe there are Epic Reveals(tm) again that force us to change our plans. I'd really like to kill Shamus but someone might start suspecting monocle-wearers because of that.
|
|
bliss
Junior Member
Posts: 63
|
Day 1
Oct 13, 2008 15:58:02 GMT -5
Post by bliss on Oct 13, 2008 15:58:02 GMT -5
I bet warban is going to get himself bandwagoned again. I'd just leave him alone for now.
|
|
|
Day 1
Oct 13, 2008 16:00:52 GMT -5
Post by MacGuffin on Oct 13, 2008 16:00:52 GMT -5
The villager could think he was onto domething if he gets jailled, and we don't want that.
|
|
bliss
Junior Member
Posts: 63
|
Day 1
Oct 13, 2008 16:05:28 GMT -5
Post by bliss on Oct 13, 2008 16:05:28 GMT -5
That's a good point too.
|
|
|
Day 1
Oct 13, 2008 16:06:50 GMT -5
Post by thetheroo on Oct 13, 2008 16:06:50 GMT -5
I'm going to go ahead and send in the order as I have it, with the interrogate and accident option filled in just in case.
Anyone who wants to change it if something comes up is free to do so.
|
|
|
Day 1
Oct 13, 2008 16:08:26 GMT -5
Post by FrostMist on Oct 13, 2008 16:08:26 GMT -5
*nods* sounds good
|
|
|
Day 1
Oct 13, 2008 16:27:42 GMT -5
Post by MacGuffin on Oct 13, 2008 16:27:42 GMT -5
And make sure to send a copy to every one of us while you're doing it, just to be sure.
|
|
|
Day 1
Oct 13, 2008 17:18:42 GMT -5
Post by thetheroo on Oct 13, 2008 17:18:42 GMT -5
Should we maybe take out the vote leader on the off chance that everyone who is tied dies?
Clarification- What is the order of actions?
|
|
bliss
Junior Member
Posts: 63
|
Day 1
Oct 13, 2008 17:55:29 GMT -5
Post by bliss on Oct 13, 2008 17:55:29 GMT -5
I wouldn't try that. If the vote does not kill everyone who is tied, the village would then figure out that the tied individuals are unlikely to be part of the Cylon forces, as we wouldn't risk our own members that way.
|
|
|
Day 1
Oct 13, 2008 20:47:29 GMT -5
Post by toxictoys on Oct 13, 2008 20:47:29 GMT -5
That is true. I'm fine with this course of action.
|
|
|
Day 1
Oct 13, 2008 22:05:55 GMT -5
Post by Plutonium on Oct 13, 2008 22:05:55 GMT -5
Oh man, if Spectre actually is a vigilante and takes the vote, so good.
|
|
|
Day 1
Oct 13, 2008 22:08:24 GMT -5
Post by crimsoncoyote on Oct 13, 2008 22:08:24 GMT -5
People might pull their votes off him...
But at least he didn't reveal as a seer
|
|